The more I read Pope’s An essay on Man the less I understand the hate that Pope receives from other writers of his time. Strictly looking at his ideas presented in his writings, such as “Say first, of God above, or man below/ What can we reason,but from what we know?” Pope is questioning the basis of our idea of God, which is what many thinkers and writers from this time were doing. So why did Pope get so much backlash as compared to these others who were starting to question and alter our ideals of God and “The Creator”? All Pope did was have the audacity to say what everyone was thinking, is there actually a God. And he presented multiple well thought out points to back him up and get his audience thinking such as “Is the great chain, that draws all to agree/ and drawn supports, upheld by God, or thee?” or “all ar but parts of one stupendous whole/ whose body, nature is, and God the soul;” which is him questioning the best way to represent and worship this “God.” Yet even when he follows the path of all great thinkers of his time, Pope still receives so much backlash. Perhaps it was because he was more forward in his writings when it came to sensitive topics. Another thing to take into account was how different Pope was and remember how people tend to reject things that are different from themselves. He was Roman Catholic and had a major physical deformity which was cause for those around him to openly detest him, and had anyone defended him they would open themselves up to ridicule just as great as Pope himself had received. So even if people actually agreed with his beliefs and ideas, none would admit it.

 

~Mikayla Degn